Less isn’t always more

“Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication” … said the great Leonardo Da Vinci. So it must be the holy grain of design, right? Ummm … yes BUT with an important disclaimer!!

Bing “simple” and “simplistic” are used interchangeably but couldn't be more different in their implications. 

Simplicity entails clarity, ease of use, and ensuring users can accomplish their tasks efficiently. But this must not translate into forced over-simplification by dumbing things down to the point that users are left wondering how to even get things done. They feel frustrated, realizing the lack of depth and richness of features they need to be truly productive. 

Take, for example, complex software tools like Photoshop, Figma, and AutoCAD. Despite their sophisticated functionalities and steep learning curves, they've retained market leadership in their respective domains for years. Even power users, who have spent countless hours mastering these tools, may not fully grasp every aspect of their capabilities. Rather than sacrificing functionality in the name of simplicity, they empower users to dive deep, explore, and unlock their full creative potential.

So, while minimalist, clutter-free layouts are all the rage, let’s be present to the fine line between sleek minimalism and downright neglecting user needs and champion a more nuanced approach to design. 

Because less isn't always more :)